I still remember the day my mom found my copy of Mortal Kombat. I was 12, and I’d convinced my older cousin to buy it for me at Toys R Us—a classic move that probably every kid of the 90s pulled at some point. I had it for exactly three glorious days before she walked in while I was performing a Spine Rip fatality as Sub-Zero. The look on her face… you’d think she’d caught me committing an actual murder. That game disappeared faster than Scorpion’s spear attack, and I was grounded for a week. Worth it? Yeah, probably.
Little did I know that while I was getting chewed out in our living room, senators in Washington were basically having the same conversation about the same game, just with more C-SPAN coverage and fewer threats to take away dessert privileges. The 1993 congressional hearings on video game violence, sparked largely by Mortal Kombat, were the first time games were treated as a potential threat to society rather than just harmless entertainment for kids. Night Trap was up there too—a game I never actually played until years later, which was hilarious because it turned out to be about as threatening as a bad episode of saved by the Bell.
These hearings weren’t just political theater (though there was plenty of that). They fundamentally changed how the industry operated. The creation of the ESRB rating system came directly from this controversy—a pre-emptive move by the industry to avoid government regulation. I remember when game boxes first started showing up with those little black-and-white rating boxes. As a kid, they might as well have put a spotlight on which games were “the good stuff.” An “M” rating was like a beacon calling out “BUY THIS ONE” to every teenager trying to look cool.
The public panic over Mortal Kombat seems almost quaint now. A few blocky, pixelated splashes of red were enough to launch a national conversation about the corruption of youth. But the Mortal Kombat controversy was just the opening act in what would become a recurring cycle of moral panic, political grandstanding, and industry adaptation.
DOOM took things to another level in 1993. I first played it at my friend Tom’s house because his parents were the “cool” ones who didn’t monitor what games he bought. We huddled around his computer in the basement, lights off for maximum effect, genuinely scared out of our minds as demons lunged at us from the darkness. It was thrilling and forbidden and exactly what my teenage self craved.
When the Columbine tragedy happened in 1999, DOOM was immediately thrust into the spotlight as a potential cause. The shooters had apparently been fans of the game, which was all the connection some needed to place blame. I remember feeling a weird sense of guilt about my own enjoyment of the game, like maybe there was something wrong with me for liking it. But even at 16, something about the connection felt too simplistic, too convenient. Millions of kids played DOOM. Almost none of them committed violent acts. The scapegoating felt unfair and intellectually lazy, a way for adults to avoid asking harder questions about gun access, mental health support, and social alienation.
The Grand Theft Auto series took controversy to new heights, especially when San Andreas released in 2004. I was in college by then, pulling all-nighters in the dorm lounge with friends as we took turns causing chaos in Los Santos. When the “Hot Coffee” mod scandal broke—revealing disabled sexual content that modders had unlocked—it created another media firestorm. The game was temporarily re-rated from M to AO (Adults Only), essentially a retail death sentence that forced Rockstar to release a cleaned-up version.
What’s funny is that most of us had no idea about the Hot Coffee content until the controversy made it national news. Then suddenly everyone was trying to figure out how to access it. It’s like the classic Streisand effect—the attempt to suppress something just made it infinitely more interesting. My roommate spent an entire weekend trying to get the mod working on his PS2 copy, only to finally succeed and discover that the content was about as erotic as a badly animated puppet show. The disappointment on his face was priceless.
These controversies weren’t limited to violence and sex. Religious themes have sparked their own firestorms. I picked up a copy of Binding of Isaac a few years back, intrigued by its roguelike gameplay. Its dark interpretation of the biblical story raised hackles among some religious groups. The game’s premise—a child escaping from his mother who believes God has commanded her to sacrifice him—isn’t exactly subtle in its critique of religious extremism. Games like these pushed boundaries on content that had been relatively untouched by the medium before.
What’s fascinating is watching how differently these controversies played out across regions. I have a Japanese friend, Kenji, who always brings me weird games when he visits from Tokyo. He once brought over a horror game that never made it to US shores because the content was deemed too disturbing for Western audiences. Meanwhile, he was baffled that games with extreme gun violence barely raised an eyebrow here but caused censorship issues in Japan. Germany has its own strict rules about Nazi imagery in games, leading to some bizarre edits in the German versions of Wolfenstein—replacing Hitler’s mustache and swastikas with fictional symbols.
My dad, who initially bought into the “games cause violence” narrative in the 90s, had a complete change of heart as research consistently failed to demonstrate any causal link. I remember him calling me during my senior year of college, excited to tell me about a news segment he’d watched debunking the connection. “You were right all along,” he admitted. That might be the only time he’s ever said those words to me, so thanks for that, gaming controversy researchers.
The industry’s response to these recurring panics evolved over time. Early on, it was mostly defensive—creating ratings systems and parental controls to ward off regulation. But as games gained cultural legitimacy and the average gamer age increased (we got older, and we kept playing), the conversation shifted toward games as art deserving free expression. I’ve watched the industry grow from being represented by fumbling executives before Congress to having articulate advocates making nuanced arguments about artistic merit and freedom.
I’ve personally straddled both sides of this debate in some ways. When I was younger, I definitely bought into the “it’s just a game, chill out” mindset. I rolled my eyes at any criticism of content as prudish or out of touch. Now, as I’ve gotten older (and balder), I can see more nuance. Games DO affect us—not by turning us into killers, but by shaping our perspectives, challenging or reinforcing our values, and presenting worldviews that we absorb to varying degrees. Acknowledging that isn’t anti-gaming; it’s recognizing the power of the medium.
My nephew Jake and I play Fortnite together sometimes. He’s 12—the same age I was during the original Mortal Kombat controversy. The game involves shooting other players, but with cartoon graphics and no blood. Is it “better” from a moral standpoint than the games that caused panic in my youth? I’m not sure. The monetization tactics targeting kids might actually be more ethically questionable than any fictional violence. The controversies have shifted with the times.
Night Trap got rereleased a few years ago, and I bought it out of historical curiosity. This game that once caused senators to clutch their pearls about the corruption of America’s youth? It’s about as threatening as a Disney Channel original movie from the early 2000s. It’s actually kind of charming in its dated cheesiness. My, how standards have changed.
I’ve got this theory that every generation needs its controversial art form to panic about. Before video games, it was rock music, TV violence, comic books, and even novels (yes, really—people once thought reading novels would corrupt women’s minds). Now, social media and AI seem to have taken over as society’s technological bogeymen, with games settled comfortably into mainstream acceptance. The cycle continues, just with new targets.
For all the frustration these controversies caused, they ultimately pushed gaming forward. Each moral panic forced the industry to mature, to develop better tools for parents, to articulate the value of games as expressive works, and to grapple with its own ethical boundaries. Each new boundary-pushing game expanded what the medium could address and how it could address it.
I still have that confiscated Mortal Kombat cartridge, by the way. My mom gave it back to me when I graduated high school—a tacit acknowledgment that I had somehow survived exposure to virtual spine removal without becoming a degenerate. It sits on my game shelf now, a small plastic rectangle that played a role in changing an entire industry. Sometimes the most controversial things leave the biggest marks. And sometimes your mom eventually admits you were old enough to handle a little pixelated blood after all. Just don’t expect her to watch you play it—some boundaries never change.
0 Comments